The course was difficult to follow due to the significant amount of facts. The slides did not fully highlight the important issues that appeared on the quiz.

This course was designed for people with a significant lighting background - that was not clear in the summary. Although the topic is fascinating, the presentation was poorly delivered (read) and the quiz questions had little to do with the presentation.

Thank you for providing the course. I am a licensed architect, not a lighting engineer. My goal was a general overview of the material. The quantity of very technical information you provided, in my opinion, needed to be delt with in greater detail for each specific area, A onetime verbal exposure to new terminology and combinations of numbers and actions to achieve these WELL-V2 standards are complex and might well have been offered in a longer presentation for better understanding.

The course was informative BUT questions asked in the quiz were not covered in the presentation.

Very informative course, thank you.

well worth the time, you are never too old to stop learning!

Too much info on EML but otherwise good

This is far too technical for use by architects. It would be better to have shown more examples of successful architectural designs that meet the requirements as opposed to listing technical jargon and specialized equipment that I will never use.

Difficult concepts for the average design professional made even more of a challenge by the poor presentation. Also, some information asked during the quiz was never mentioned, i.e. question #5: What is the recommended distance from workstations to windows... I would not recommend this course to an associate.

The course was found to informative in describing the criteria used to evaluate light levels in the spaces that compromise the majority of human beings' daily lives.

I found the course interesting in terms of the general concepts discussed including well standards in general and light specifically. It hit concepts that were useful. I did not find the technical discussion of rating and levels and luminaires appropriate in a 1 hours course. trying to conceptualize with the numbers being put out was too much for this level of course for me.

I found the speaker very well versed, but unfortunately the graphics, although nice had not as much in formation for the program - as I would have preferred.